Mustis
Enthusiast
- Mitglied seit
- 18.08.2015
- Beiträge
- 1.167

"Its core stance has been summarized by The Guardian as a "trusted three-card trick of privatisation, deregulation and liberalisation".[1]"Der da wäre?![]()
"In 2009, The Economist website featured this note about its editorial stance:
"What, besides free trade and free markets, does The Economist believe in? 'It is to the Radicals that The Economist still likes to think of itself as belonging. The extreme centre is the paper's historical position.' That is as true today as when former Economist editor Geoffrey Crowther said it in 1955. The Economist considers itself the enemy of privilege, pomposity and predictability. It has backed conservatives such as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. It has supported the Americans in Vietnam. But it has also endorsed Harold Wilson and Bill Clinton, and espoused a variety of liberal causes: opposing capital punishment from its earliest days, while favoring penal reform and decolonization, as well as—most recently—gun control and gay marriage."[2]

The Economist editorial stance - Wikipedia
Also klar zentralistisch liberal und wohl eher konservativ als progressiv was die Wirtschaftsideologie angeht. Sehe ich zumindest so, wenn als Eigenbeschreibung Thatcher und Reagan als "Vorbilder" genannt werden. Es verwundert also eher weniger, wenn der Economist Deruglation eher bevorzugt als Regularien.
Zuletzt bearbeitet: