Aktueller Inhalt von Antinomy

  1. A

    [Sammelthread] Sockel 370 / Tualatin

    Another thing to check is that you are using the same version of Everest. Some versions give weird numbers and cannot be compared to others. I see nothing obvious in the registers. @MadYoshi you have checked you board with 1CPU and 1 memory stick, am I right? And nothing changed?
  2. A

    [Sammelthread] Sockel 370 / Tualatin

    This is standard for most VIA chipsets: 50, 51 = FF Memory timings (64-67 but only those that are really populated by RAM modules) = 12 6A=FF This should already fix 95% of performance problems. With bad RAM these settings might not work, it's the perfect case to reach.
  3. A

    [Sammelthread] AMD K8/K9 - Sockel 939 | 940 | 754

    Thank you. Yes, the CAB1E/CAB2E are an interesting case for overclocking. But since AMD decided to make then seem as normal Venice CPUs, it's almost impossible to detect them by software. I think we can identify them by K8 manufacturing ID (CPU-Z txt report shows this value) but I didn't have...
  4. A

    [Sammelthread] AMD K7 - Sockel A (462)

    @Tzk , I remember you tried different memory chips on NF2. Could you remind, how did they behave? Anything worth interest besides Winbond?
  5. A

    [Sammelthread] AMD K8/K9 - Sockel 939 | 940 | 754

    @Tzk @digitalbath @WMDK since it's about AMD, I'll post here. This is one of the good sources about microcode update disassembling and modification. https://files.samantaz.fr/useful_knowledge/studies/usenix/sec17-koppe.pdf It explains CPU microcode ROM, microcode update structure and what...
  6. A

    [Sammelthread] AMD K8/K9 - Sockel 939 | 940 | 754

    I've written an article about all those blanks in the Athlon 64 we had so far. Enjoy it if you like the AMD K8 architecture. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1el2MxtWsXVTsgcw0ql7OWZZO0akG1Dm0qUaHWqo4x2U/
  7. A

    [Sammelthread] Netburst Evolution - Pentium IV/M 478/479 & Xeon 603/604 Stammtisch

    Yes, XP has microcode update too. So you want to disable it so it doesn't interfere with the tests. You could try this method (7.2). I've used registry to disable it. Let me know if the device manager method won't work, I'll look for the registry. Thank you for the input about solder/paste...
  8. A

    [Sammelthread] Netburst Evolution - Pentium IV/M 478/479 & Xeon 603/604 Stammtisch

    In fact, it is like assembler, bytecode. At least for AMD there were studies that reverse-engineered microcode updates. I'll give a link if I find it in my notes. Very unlikely. I don't think microcodes are related to FSB. Sometimes yes, some undocumented MSR control various features (think...
  9. A

    [Sammelthread] Der DDR1 Ram-Chip Thread

    I'd suggest to try relax subtimings first of all tRC and tRFC, should give a nice improvement on 512Mbit chips. Very impressive results though. Would be interesting to know their voltage scaling too.
  10. A

    [Sammelthread] Netburst Evolution - Pentium IV/M 478/479 & Xeon 603/604 Stammtisch

    Another small thing about PAT: PAT is not a single technology. In fact it's two settings that work similar: 1) Fast CS# (it's present in all P4 chipsets starting from 845). Gigabyte boards have it as a separate setting with Advanced (ctrl+F1) menu. 2) Faster ADS# strobe (this one is new). I've...
  11. A

    [Sammelthread] AMD K8/K9 - Sockel 939 | 940 | 754

    It's a very gray area and always was. Some 3DMark and many PCMark alterations were obvious cheats like repacking texture archives, changing benchmark DLLs and so on. But some fall within the "general tweak" when a certain technique doesn't speed up only the benchmark but the system as a whole...
  12. A

    [Sammelthread] Der DDR1 Ram-Chip Thread

    Kingston 1GB with Infineon BC-6 chips.
  13. A

    [Sammelthread] Netburst Evolution - Pentium IV/M 478/479 & Xeon 603/604 Stammtisch

    BSEL mod? Not this option disables PCI clk from clockgen if the PCI slot is not populated. Same menu with RAM on old boards. Was called "disabled unused PCI/DIMM clocks" or like that.
  14. A

    [Sammelthread] Der DDR1 Ram-Chip Thread

    I think they might be just fake. Compare the letters for capacitor places (C52, C23, C15) with letters on the chips (Qimonda). They are barely readable. I have similar BGA sticks, Qimonda BF-5 with Kingston KVR logo. I will post photos in the evening for comparison.
Hardwareluxx setzt keine externen Werbe- und Tracking-Cookies ein. Auf unserer Webseite finden Sie nur noch Cookies nach berechtigtem Interesse (Art. 6 Abs. 1 Satz 1 lit. f DSGVO) oder eigene funktionelle Cookies. Durch die Nutzung unserer Webseite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir diese Cookies setzen. Mehr Informationen und Möglichkeiten zur Einstellung unserer Cookies finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.


Zurück
Oben Unten refresh